All Publications
6 min read

SEC Clarifies Municipal-Advisor Registration for P3 and Infrastructure Participants: July 2026 Guidance | ULF New York

Regulatory and Compliance

SEC Clarifies Municipal-Advisor Registration for P3 and Infrastructure Participants: July 2026 Guidance

The SEC's Office of Municipal Securities updated its municipal-advisor FAQs on July 10, 2026, specifically addressing when participants in public-private partnerships may need municipal-advisor registration, which remote-work locations must be disclosed as offices, and what records must be retained when advising on municipal-securities pricing. The guidance is directly relevant to P3 developers, infrastructure consultants, financial advisors, investment banks, placement agents, and contractors advising state or local authorities on infrastructure financing.

U
ULF New York
6 min read

The SEC's Office of Municipal Securities updated its municipal-advisor frequently asked questions (FAQs) on July 10, 2026. The updated guidance specifically addresses three areas that have generated uncertainty among infrastructure and P3 market participants:

  1. When participants in public-private partnerships may need municipal-advisor registration
  2. Which remote-work locations must be disclosed as branch offices
  3. What records must be retained when advising on municipal-securities pricing

The guidance is directly relevant to P3 developers, infrastructure consultants, financial advisors, investment banks, placement agents, and contractors that advise state or local government authorities on infrastructure financing.

Background: The Municipal Advisor Registration Requirement

Dodd-Frank Act and SEC Rule 15Ba1

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 created a new category of regulated person: the "municipal advisor." Under Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by Dodd-Frank, persons who provide advice to or on behalf of a municipal entity or obligated person with respect to municipal financial products or the issuance of municipal securities must register with the SEC as municipal advisors.

SEC Rule 15Ba1-1 defines "municipal advisor" broadly to include persons who provide advice with respect to the issuance of municipal securities — including advice on the structure, timing, terms, and other similar matters concerning a municipal securities issuance. The rule includes financial advisors, investment advisors, and others who provide such advice, but excludes underwriters, registered investment advisers providing investment advice, and certain other categories.

Penalties for Unregistered Activity

Providing municipal advisory services without registration is a violation of Section 15B of the Exchange Act. The SEC can bring enforcement actions against unregistered municipal advisors, seeking civil penalties, disgorgement of fees, and injunctive relief. Municipal entities that engage unregistered advisors may also face consequences, including potential rescission of transactions.

The July 10 Guidance: P3 Participants

When P3 Participants Need Registration

The updated FAQs address the question of when a participant in a public-private partnership — such as a developer, contractor, consultant, or financial intermediary — crosses the line from providing commercial or technical services into providing regulated municipal advisory services.

The SEC's guidance confirms that the municipal-advisor definition can apply to P3 participants who provide advice to a municipal entity on the financing structure of a P3 transaction — including advice on whether to issue municipal securities, the terms of any municipal securities issuance, or the allocation of financial risk between the public and private parties. The mere fact that a participant is also providing commercial or technical services does not exempt it from the municipal-advisor registration requirement if it is also providing advice on the financing structure.

The Underwriter Exemption

The municipal-advisor definition excludes underwriters acting in their capacity as underwriters. However, the underwriter exemption applies only when the firm is actually acting as an underwriter — not when it is providing financial advisory services in connection with a P3 transaction. Investment banks that provide both underwriting and advisory services in P3 transactions must carefully delineate which services are being provided in which capacity.

Practical Implications for P3 Participants

P3 developers, infrastructure consultants, financial advisors, investment banks, and placement agents advising state or local authorities on P3 transactions should:

  • Assess whether their activities constitute regulated municipal advice under the updated FAQ guidance
  • Ensure that engagement letters clearly distinguish commercial services, technical services, underwriting services, and municipal-advisory services
  • Avoid providing advice on financing structure, issuance terms, or pricing unless registered as a municipal advisor or covered by an applicable exemption
  • Consult with legal counsel before providing any advice to a municipal entity on the financial terms of a P3 transaction

Remote-Work Office Disclosure

The updated FAQs also address which remote-work locations must be disclosed as branch offices on Form MA. The SEC's guidance clarifies that a location where a municipal advisor's associated person regularly conducts municipal advisory activities — including a home office — may need to be disclosed as a branch office, depending on the facts and circumstances.

Municipal advisors that have adopted remote-work arrangements since the COVID-19 pandemic should review their Form MA filings to confirm that all locations where associated persons regularly conduct municipal advisory activities are properly disclosed.

Recordkeeping for Municipal-Securities Pricing Advice

The third area addressed by the updated FAQs concerns recordkeeping obligations when a municipal advisor provides advice on municipal-securities pricing. SEC Rule 15Ba1-8 requires municipal advisors to make and keep records related to their municipal advisory activities. The updated guidance clarifies what records must be retained when a municipal advisor provides pricing advice — including records of the pricing analysis, the basis for the pricing recommendation, and communications with the municipal entity regarding pricing.

Municipal advisors that provide pricing advice should review their recordkeeping procedures to ensure compliance with the updated guidance.

Implications for Turkish Companies and Investors

Turkish companies pursuing U.S. infrastructure P3 opportunities. Turkish construction companies, infrastructure developers, and engineering firms that pursue P3 opportunities with U.S. state and local governments should be aware of the municipal-advisor registration framework. Providing advice on the financing structure of a P3 transaction — even as part of a broader commercial or technical engagement — may trigger registration obligations. Turkish companies should structure their U.S. P3 engagements carefully and engage U.S. legal counsel to assess registration risk before providing any advice on financing terms.

Turkish financial institutions and investment banks. Turkish banks and investment banks that participate in U.S. municipal finance transactions — including as placement agents or financial advisors in P3 transactions — should assess whether their activities require municipal-advisor registration. The updated FAQ guidance increases the risk that advisory activities in P3 transactions will be characterized as regulated municipal advice.

Infrastructure investment and Turkey-U.S. partnerships. The U.S. infrastructure market — including transportation, water, energy, and social infrastructure — is a significant opportunity for Turkish companies with P3 experience. Understanding the regulatory framework for municipal finance, including the municipal-advisor registration requirement, is a prerequisite for participating effectively in U.S. P3 transactions.

ULF New York advises Turkish companies and investors on U.S. securities regulation, municipal finance, and infrastructure investment in the United States.

Explore Topics

#SEC#municipal-advisor#P3#public-private-partnership#infrastructure#Dodd-Frank#registration#municipal-securities#MSRB#compliance#financial-advisory#investment-bank#placement-agent#United-States
U

Written by

ULF New York

ULF New York legal team — New York-based attorneys advising Turkish companies and investors on U.S. market entry, corporate law, real estate, and international trade.

Share this article

X
ULF New York Bülteni

ABD Hukuk Rehberlerini
Doğrudan Alın

E-posta adresiniz yalnızca ULF New York hukuki içerikleri için kullanılır. İstediğiniz zaman aboneliğinizi iptal edebilirsiniz.

Related analysis and guides

Further Reading

Regulatory and Compliance5 min read

SEC Proposes Regulation E-Delivery: Electronic Delivery as Default for Securities-Law Communications

The SEC has proposed Regulation E-Delivery, which would make electronic delivery the default method for most information required under federal securities laws—without requiring prior affirmative consent from each recipient. The proposal affects public companies, investment funds, broker-dealers, investment advisers, transfer agents, and transaction counsel. Comments will be due 60 days after Federal Register publication.

Read article
Regulatory and Compliance5 min read

FDIC Proposes Extensive Reporting Requirements for Stablecoin Issuers Under GENIUS Act Framework

The FDIC has filed proposed information-collection forms for FDIC-supervised permitted payment stablecoin issuers under its GENIUS Act implementation framework. Scheduled for Federal Register publication on July 20, 2026, the proposal would require large issuers (at least $1 billion outstanding or $100 million average daily transaction volume) to submit detailed weekly reports, while smaller issuers use an abridged form. All covered issuers would submit quarterly call-report-style filings. Stablecoin issuers, sponsoring banks, custodians, exchanges, fintech companies, and institutional counterparties should begin assessing data-readiness now.

Read article
Regulatory and Compliance6 min read

FTC $2.25 Million Settlement with RentGrow Raises FCRA Compliance Standards for Tenant-Screening Industry

RentGrow agreed to pay $2.25 million to resolve FTC allegations that its tenant-screening reports violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act and FTC Act. The FTC alleged that reports contained duplicate criminal or eviction records, failed to disclose all data sources, inadequately handled consumer disputes, and misrepresented whether corrected reports had been communicated to property managers. The proposed order requires improved accuracy procedures and FCRA compliance. The settlement raises compliance standards for the entire tenant-screening industry and creates new due-diligence obligations for landlords, property managers, and multifamily operators.

Read article
Sanctions and Regulatory Compliance5 min read

OFAC Restructures Hong Kong Sanctions Following Expiration of E.O. 13936 National Emergency

The national emergency declared under Executive Order 13936 expired on July 14, 2026. OFAC has removed persons sanctioned solely under that authority from the SDN List, but Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act and Hong Kong Autonomy Act restrictions remain operative. Persons still subject to Hong Kong Autonomy Act restrictions have been moved to OFAC's Non-SDN Menu-Based Sanctions List. Previously blocked property does not automatically unblock. Banks, real estate funds, corporate service providers, and businesses using Hong Kong holding companies must immediately refresh screening databases and conduct transaction-specific OFAC analyses before releasing any blocked assets.

Read article

Published

Saturday, July 11, 2026

Back to Publications