All Publications
5 min read

OFAC Restructures Hong Kong Sanctions Following Expiration of E.O. 13936 National Emergency | ULF New York

Sanctions and Regulatory Compliance

OFAC Restructures Hong Kong Sanctions Following Expiration of E.O. 13936 National Emergency

The national emergency declared under Executive Order 13936 expired on July 14, 2026. OFAC has removed persons sanctioned solely under that authority from the SDN List, but Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act and Hong Kong Autonomy Act restrictions remain operative. Persons still subject to Hong Kong Autonomy Act restrictions have been moved to OFAC's Non-SDN Menu-Based Sanctions List. Previously blocked property does not automatically unblock. Banks, real estate funds, corporate service providers, and businesses using Hong Kong holding companies must immediately refresh screening databases and conduct transaction-specific OFAC analyses before releasing any blocked assets.

U
ULF New York
5 min read

The national emergency declared under Executive Order 13936 ("Hong Kong Normalization") expired on July 14, 2026. The Office of Foreign Assets Control has taken a series of consequential actions in response, restructuring the U.S. sanctions framework applicable to Hong Kong-related persons and transactions.

What Changed on July 14, 2026

SDN List Removals

OFAC has removed from the SDN List persons who were sanctioned solely under the authority of E.O. 13936. These individuals and entities are no longer subject to the asset-freeze and U.S.-person-dealing prohibitions that apply to SDN-listed parties.

Hong Kong Autonomy Act Restrictions Remain

The expiration of E.O. 13936 does not affect the continued operation of:

  • The Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act (HKHRDA)
  • The Hong Kong Autonomy Act (HKAA)

Persons who remain subject to restrictions under the Hong Kong Autonomy Act have been moved or added to OFAC's Non-SDN Menu-Based Sanctions List (NS-MBS List). The NS-MBS List imposes a different — and in some respects more complex — set of restrictions than the SDN List. Covered persons on the NS-MBS List are subject to menu-based sanctions that may include correspondent account restrictions, property-blocking, visa denials, and other measures, depending on the specific designation.

Previously Blocked Property

Property that was blocked before July 14, 2026 does not automatically unblock merely because the relevant person was removed from the SDN List. OFAC has made clear that the removal of a party from the SDN List does not, by itself, authorize the release of previously blocked funds, assets, or property. Each situation requires a transaction-specific OFAC analysis before any blocked asset is released.

Regulatory Updates Pending

OFAC has indicated that implementing regulations and guidance will be updated to reflect the restructured framework. Compliance officers should monitor OFAC's website for updated regulations, FAQs, and general licenses.

Practical Implications

For Banks and Financial Institutions

Banks and financial institutions should take the following steps immediately:

  • Refresh screening databases to reflect the SDN List removals and NS-MBS List additions. Automated screening systems that rely on SDN List data alone will not capture NS-MBS List designations.
  • Analyze each apparent delisting carefully. A party removed from the SDN List may still be subject to menu-based restrictions under the HKAA, may control or be controlled by an entity that remains designated, or may be subject to secondary-sanctions exposure.
  • Do not release blocked funds or assets without a transaction-specific OFAC analysis. The automatic-unblocking assumption is incorrect and could expose the institution to OFAC enforcement.
  • Review correspondent banking relationships involving Hong Kong counterparties, particularly where the counterparty or its beneficial owners may be subject to NS-MBS List restrictions.

For Real Estate Funds and Investors

Real estate funds and investors with Hong Kong-connected counterparties, beneficial owners, or holding structures should:

  • Screen all Hong Kong-connected parties against both the SDN List and the NS-MBS List
  • Review existing investments where Hong Kong holding companies or beneficial owners are involved
  • Assess whether previously blocked escrow funds or transaction proceeds may now be released, and obtain OFAC analysis before doing so

For Corporate Service Providers

Corporate service providers — including registered agents, trust companies, and corporate administrators — that maintain Hong Kong-connected entities should:

  • Update KYC and beneficial-ownership records to reflect the changed sanctions status of relevant parties
  • Screen all Hong Kong-connected beneficial owners against the NS-MBS List
  • Review service agreements with parties that may have been removed from the SDN List but remain subject to HKAA restrictions

For Trading Companies and Businesses Using Hong Kong Holding Structures

Trading companies and businesses that use Hong Kong holding companies or transact with Hong Kong-connected counterparties should:

  • Immediately refresh sanctions screening for all Hong Kong-connected counterparties, suppliers, customers, and beneficial owners
  • Review open transactions and contracts involving Hong Kong entities to assess whether any party is subject to NS-MBS List restrictions
  • Consult OFAC counsel before releasing any previously blocked payments or assets

Key Distinctions: SDN List vs. NS-MBS List

FeatureSDN ListNS-MBS List
Asset freezeYes — all property blockedDepends on specific menu items
U.S.-person dealingsProhibitedDepends on specific menu items
Correspondent account restrictionsYes (for SDN banks)May apply under HKAA
Screening system coverageStandardRequires separate NS-MBS List screening
Automatic unblocking on removalNoN/A

Next Steps for Compliance Officers

  1. Update screening systems to include the NS-MBS List as a separate screening source
  2. Conduct a targeted review of all Hong Kong-connected counterparties, beneficial owners, and holding structures
  3. Do not release blocked assets without written OFAC analysis
  4. Monitor OFAC guidance for updated regulations and general licenses
  5. Review internal policies governing Hong Kong-related transactions to reflect the restructured framework

This alert is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance on how the OFAC Hong Kong sanctions restructuring may affect your specific compliance obligations, please contact ULF New York.

Explore Topics

#OFAC#sanctions#Hong-Kong#SDN#E.O.-13936#Hong-Kong-Autonomy-Act#Hong-Kong-Human-Rights-Democracy-Act#menu-based-sanctions#compliance#screening#blocked-property#United-States
U

Written by

ULF New York

ULF New York legal team — New York-based attorneys advising Turkish companies and investors on U.S. market entry, corporate law, real estate, and international trade.

Share this article

X
ULF New York Bülteni

ABD Hukuk Rehberlerini
Doğrudan Alın

E-posta adresiniz yalnızca ULF New York hukuki içerikleri için kullanılır. İstediğiniz zaman aboneliğinizi iptal edebilirsiniz.

Related analysis and guides

Further Reading

Sanctions and Compliance6 min read

OFAC Expands Iran-Related Sanctions to Global Real Estate, Exchange Houses, and Front Companies: July 2026 Designations

On July 10, 2026, OFAC designated Iranian financier Ali Ansari, his Saint Kitts and Nevis holding company Smart Global Limited, three Iranian exchange-house networks, their controlling persons, and front companies in Hong Kong and the UAE. Treasury states the network used shell companies, bank accounts, real estate, and commercial investments across Europe and the UAE to benefit Iranian regime figures and the IRGC. The designations create civil, criminal, and secondary-sanctions exposure for U.S. and non-U.S. parties transacting with the network.

Read article
Sanctions & Export Controls6 min read

OFAC Sanctions and Commodity Trading: Managing Exposure in Cross-Border Transactions

OFAC sanctions enforcement has reached record levels. For Turkish companies engaged in commodity trading, energy transactions, and cross-border commerce, understanding sanctions exposure — and building robust compliance programs — is no longer optional.

Read article
Regulatory and Compliance5 min read

FDIC Proposes Extensive Reporting Requirements for Stablecoin Issuers Under GENIUS Act Framework

The FDIC has filed proposed information-collection forms for FDIC-supervised permitted payment stablecoin issuers under its GENIUS Act implementation framework. Scheduled for Federal Register publication on July 20, 2026, the proposal would require large issuers (at least $1 billion outstanding or $100 million average daily transaction volume) to submit detailed weekly reports, while smaller issuers use an abridged form. All covered issuers would submit quarterly call-report-style filings. Stablecoin issuers, sponsoring banks, custodians, exchanges, fintech companies, and institutional counterparties should begin assessing data-readiness now.

Read article
Regulatory and Compliance5 min read

SEC Proposes Regulation E-Delivery: Electronic Delivery as Default for Securities-Law Communications

The SEC has proposed Regulation E-Delivery, which would make electronic delivery the default method for most information required under federal securities laws—without requiring prior affirmative consent from each recipient. The proposal affects public companies, investment funds, broker-dealers, investment advisers, transfer agents, and transaction counsel. Comments will be due 60 days after Federal Register publication.

Read article

Published

Friday, July 17, 2026

Back to Publications